A finite analog to the löwenheim-Skolem theorem

Studia Logica 53 (4):503 - 532 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The traditional model theory of first-order logic assumes that the interpretation of a formula can be given without reference to its deductive context. This paper investigates an interpretation which depends on a formula's location within a derivation. The key step is to drop the assumption that all quantified variables must have the same range and to require only that the ranges of variables in a derivation must be related in such way as to preserve the soundness of the inference rules. With each (consistent) derivation there is associated a Buridan-Volpin (orBV) structure [M, {r(x)}] which is simply a Tarski structureM for the language and a map giving the ranger(x) of each variablex in the derivation. IfLK* is (approximately) the classical sequent calculusLK of Gentzen from which the structural contraction rules have been dropped, then our main result reads: If a set of first-ordered formulas has a Tarski modelM, then from any normal derivationD inLK* of can be constructed aBV modelM D=[M, {r(x)}] of where each ranger(x) is finite.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cylindric modal logic.Yde Venema - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (2):591-623.
The Skolem-löwenheim theorem in toposes.Marek Zawadowski - 1983 - Studia Logica 42 (4):461 - 475.
Skolem's Paradox.Timothy Bays - 2012 - In Peter Adamson (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Reflections on Skolem's Paradox.Timothy Bays - 2000 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
47 (#345,300)

6 months
10 (#302,860)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Introduction to metamathematics.Stephen Cole Kleene - 1952 - Groningen: P. Noordhoff N.V..
Remarks on the foundations of mathematics.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1967 - Oxford [Eng.]: Blackwell. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe, Rush Rhees & G. H. von Wright.
Proof theory.Gaisi Takeuti - 1975 - New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
A theory of truth based on a medieval solution to the liar paradox.Richard L. Epstein - 1992 - History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (2):149-177.

View all 6 references / Add more references