Concluding Remarks

Studies in Christian Ethics 25 (2):269-272 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I suggest some ways in which a certain type of ‘post-foundationalism’ has had a deleterious effect in theological ethics. Much ‘post-foundationalism’ is in truth still foundationalism, albeit less reflective and more permissive, leading to a balkanised plethora of foundationalist systems. Although Wittgenstein is critical of foundationalism, it is by applying Wittgensteinian insights that we are able to avoid some of the reductive and unipolar thinking that has characterised some recent theological discussion

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Concluding Remarks.A. Ia Flier - 2003 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 41 (4):87-92.
Concluding remarks.Cornelius Krusé - 1959 - Philosophy East and West 9 (1/2):86-87.
Concluding Remarks.Emilien Lamirande - 1974 - The Saint Augustine Lecture Series 9 (1):70-76.
A Companion to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.Max Black - 1964 - Cambridge University Press.
Language and Loneliness: Arendt, Cavell, and Modernity.Martin Shuster - 2012 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (4):473-497.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-05-31

Downloads
40 (#408,716)

6 months
6 (#582,229)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references