Expert Testimony by Ethicists: What Should Be the Norm?

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (2):198-221 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The term, “bioethics” was coined in 1970 by American cancerologist V. R. Potter. In the few decades since, the field of bioethics has emerged as an important discipline. The field has attained a remarkable degree of public recognition in a relatively short period of time. The “right to die” cases such as In re Quinlan placed bioethical issues on the front pages. Although the discipline is of recent vintage, the past quarter century has witnessed a flurry of scholarly activity, creating a substantial body of bioethical literature. Moreover, the bioethics movement has manifested itself in institutional expressions. Universities and medical schools have added courses in bioethics to their curricula. In 1974, federal legislation and regulations mandated that federal grantees conducting human subjects research establish institutional review boards to safeguard subjects’ welfare, and even absent a legislative mandate numerous hospitals created ethics committees. Centers and institutes, devoted exclusively to the study of bioethical issues, have been founded.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Expert Testimony by Ethicists: What Should be the Norm?Edward J. Imwinkelried - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (2):198-221.
Expert Opinion and Second‐Hand Knowledge.Matthew A. Benton - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (2):492-508.
English Law's Epistemology of Expert Testimony.Tony Ward - 2006 - Journal of Law and Society 33 (4):572-595.
Ethics Expert Testimony: Against the Skeptics.G. J. Agich & B. J. Spielman - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (4):381-403.
Testimony and the Constitutive Norm of Assertion.Casey Rebecca Johnson - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (3):356-375.
A Critical Introduction to Testimony.Axel Gelfert - 2014 - New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
What is Wrong With Moral Testimony?Robert Hopkins - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (3):611-634.
Understanding and Evaluating Expert Testimony in the Law.David Joshua Strauss - 2004 - Dissertation, University of California, Riverside

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
25 (#631,726)

6 months
6 (#514,728)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Expert Bioethics Testimony.Stephen R. Latham - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (2):242-247.
Expert Bioethics Testimony.Stephen R. Latham - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (2):242-247.
Ethics Expertise in Civil Litigation.Kenneth Kipnis - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (2):274-278.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Case studies in medical ethics.Robert M. Veatch - 1977 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Rethinking evidence: exploratory essays.William Twining - 1990 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 33 references / Add more references