What does Gettier prove?

Abstract

Both of Gettier's examples are not representative of situations in which we would claim knowledge – we do not use language in this way. Therefore, Gettier has not shown that justified true belief is insufficient for knowledge. I am not denying that there is a problem about the definition of knowledge. Several decades earlier, Russell dealt with this problem, using a stopped clock to illustrate it.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Is knowledge justified true belief?John Turri - 2012 - Synthese 184 (3):247-259.
Non-Pickwickian Belief and 'the Gettier Problem'.John Biro - 2017 - Logos and Episteme 8 (1):47-69.
What Should a Theory of Knowledge Do?Elijah Chudnoff - 2011 - Dialectica 65 (4):561-579.
The maturation of the Gettier problem.Allan Hazlett - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (1):1-6.
Is justified true behavior knowledge?.Frank Hammonds - 2010 - Behavior and Philosophy 38:49-59.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-10

Downloads
136 (#136,307)

6 months
42 (#95,656)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Miroslav Imbrisevic
Open University (UK)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references