A note on an alternative Gentzenization of RW+∘

Mathematical Logic Quarterly 67 (2):186-192 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In our paper [3], a sequent system for the contraction‐less positive relevant logic with co‐tenability,, is considered. Its sequent system with the rule of cut, which does not involve the truth constant t, is presented, and the proof that it admits the elimination of cut is given. However, in the proof of the cut‐elimination theorem some forms of proofs, which may cause difficulties for the cut‐elimination argument, are not considered. The purpose of this paper is to present them and to re‐prove that admits the elimination of cut.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The gentzenization and decidability of RW.Ross T. Brady - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (1):35 - 73.
An alternative Gentzenisation of RW+∘.Mirjana Ilić - 2016 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 62 (6):465-480.
Gentzenization of Trilattice Logics.Mitio Takano - 2016 - Studia Logica 104 (5):917-929.
A note on full intuitionistic linear logic.G. M. Bierman - 1996 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 79 (3):281-287.
Gentzen semantics for de Morgan lattice logic1.Andre T. Fuhrmann - 1986 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 15 (1):96-102.
Off-Topic: A New Interpretation of Weak-Kleene Logic.Jc Beall - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Logic 13 (6).

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-30

Downloads
2 (#1,809,554)

6 months
2 (#1,206,551)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

TW+ and RW+ are decidable.Steve Giambrone - 1985 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 14 (3):235 - 254.
An alternative Gentzenisation of RW+∘.Mirjana Ilić - 2016 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 62 (6):465-480.

Add more references