Differences in Conceptual Understanding of the “Actionability” of Incidental Findings and the Resultant Difference in Ethical Responsibility: An Empirical Study in Japan

AJOB Empirical Bioethics 11 (3):187-194 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical perception: are differences between ethnic groups situation dependent?Jo Ann Ho - 2010 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 19 (2):154-182.
Ethical and Conceptual Issues in Eating Disorders.Louis C. Charland - 2013 - Current Opinion in Psychiatry 26 (6):562-565.
The Relevance of Responsibility to Ethical Business Decisions.Patrick E. Murphy - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (S2):245 - 252.
Genomic Research and Incidental Findings.Brian Van Ness - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):292-297.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-03

Downloads
15 (#946,138)

6 months
7 (#428,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?