The Evolution of Ecosystem Phenotypes

Biological Theory 15 (2):91-106 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Evolution by natural selection has been extended to several supraorganismic levels, but whether it can apply to ecosystems remains controversial on two main counts. First, local ecosystems are loosely individuated, so that it is unclear how they manifest heredity and fitness. Second, even if they did, the meta-ecosystem formed by this population of local ecosystems will also suffer from a very low degree of cohesion, which will jeopardize any ENS. We suggest a way to overcome both issues, focusing on ecosystem properties rather than on ecosystemic individuals. First, we follow recent theoretical developments which deny the centrality of reproduction in ENS. This leads us to merge heredity and fitness in a single process, in which a local ecosystem causally influences its neighbors, in a way responsible for their phenotypic similarity. Second, we suggest that the resulting meta-ecosystem need not meet the criteria of individuality. Instead, the evolving meta-ecosystem is best understood as a homeostatic property cluster, i.e., a set of phenotypes that together evolve by ENS at the ecosystem level. We illustrate this conceptual framework with a hypothetical example of local ecosystems that vary in terms of stability, productivity, diversity, and complementarity between species. Finally, we stress that our property-based account of ecosystemic ENS can help understand evolution at other biological levels, such as early life evolution and holobionts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Value of Ecosystem Health.J. Baird Callicott - 1995 - Environmental Values 4 (4):345 - 361.
Rights to Ecosystem Services.Marc D. Davidson - 2014 - Environmental Values 23 (4):465-483.
Ecosystem Health: More than a Metaphor?David J. Rapport - 1995 - Environmental Values 4 (4):287-309.
Ecosystem Engineering, Experiment, and Evolution.Trevor Pearce - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (6):793-812.
Why not interfere with nature?Mark A. Michael - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (1):89-112.
Anchoring in Ecosystemic Kinds.Matthew H. Slater - 2018 - Synthese 195 (4):1487-1508.
Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Critical Assessment.Simon P. James - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):338-350.
Ecosystem Health.Katie Mcshane - 2004 - Environmental Ethics 26 (3):227-245.
Epidemiology is ecosystem science.Keekok Lee - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 10):2539-2567.
Applying the Capabilities Approach to Ecosystems.Teea Kortetmäki - 2017 - Environmental Ethics 39 (1):39-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-20

Downloads
32 (#500,820)

6 months
11 (#239,725)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sébastien Ibanez
Université Savoie Mont Blanc

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2009 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection.Charles Darwin - 1897 - New York: Heritage Press. Edited by George W. Davidson.
Evolution and the levels of selection.Samir Okasha - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The origin of species by means of natural selection.Charles Darwin - 1859 - Franklin Center, Pa.: Franklin Library. Edited by J. W. Burrow.

View all 52 references / Add more references