The deep structure of confucianism: A social psychological approach

Asian Philosophy 11 (3):179 – 204 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The deep structure of Confucianism is identified through structuralist analysis in order to provide a conceptual framework for conducting social psychological research in Chinese society. Through understanding and imitating the Way of Heaven (tiendao), Confucians constructed the Way of Humanity (rendao), which consists of two aspects; ethics for ordinary people and ethics for scholars. Ethics for ordinary people adopts the principle of Respecting the Superior for procedural justice and the principle of Favouring the Intimate for distributive justice; the person who occupies the superior position should play the role of decision-maker and should allocate resources by favouring intimate relationships. Because Confucian cosmology suggests that the Way of Humanity corresponds to the Way of Heaven, Confucians required individuals to cultivate themselves with the Way of Humanity. Ethics for scholars further endows Confucian disciples with the mission of benefiting the whole society with the Way of Humanity

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
115 (#155,564)

6 months
13 (#197,285)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Critique of Practical Reason.Immanuel Kant (ed.) - 1788 - New York,: Hackett Publishing Company.
Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Confucian thought: selfhood as creative transformation.Weiming Tu - 1985 - Albany: State University of New York Press.
Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action.Alfred Schuetz - 1953 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14 (1):1-38.
The evolution of the confucian concept jên.Wing-Tsit Chan - 1955 - Philosophy East and West 4 (4):295-319.

View all 9 references / Add more references