The Demise of Compatibilism?

Abstract

This paper suggests that the arguments for compatibilism are invalid because they use incompatible definitions of causal determinism and free will, an illegitimate definition of free will, and a logical fallacy concerning free will and morality.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Revisionist Turn: A Brief History of Recent Work on Free Will.Manuel Vargas - 2010 - In Jesús H. Aguilar, Andrei A. Buckareff & Keith Frankish (eds.), New waves in philosophy of action. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Causation and Free Will.T. L. Hurst - manuscript
Great Philosophical Debates.Shaun Nichols - 2008 - Teaching Co..
Challenges for compatibilism.K. Machina - 1994 - American Philosophical Quarterly 31 (3):213-22.
Humean compatibilism.Helen Beebee & Alfred Mele - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):201-223.
Compatibilism.Richard Foley - 1978 - Mind 87 (July):421-28.
Compatibilism again.David B. Hausman - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):509-514.
Is hard determinism a form of compatibilism?Jeremy Randel Koons - 2002 - Philosophical Forum 33 (1):81-99.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-18

Downloads
88 (#192,982)

6 months
1 (#1,471,470)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references