A general account of selection: Biology, immunology, and behavior-Open Peer Commentary-Operant learning and selectionism: Risks and benefits of seeking interdisciplinary parallels

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):544-544 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Seeking parallels among disciplines can have both risks and benefits. Finding parallels may be a vacuous exercise in categorization, generating no new insights. And pointing to analogous functions may cause us to treat them as homologous. Hull et al. have provided a basis for the generation of insights in different selectionist areas, without confusing analogy with homology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Selection in operant learning may fit a general model.Julian C. Leslie - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):542-543.
Is operant selectionism coherent?François Tonneau & Michel B. C. Sokolowski - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):558-559.
On the origins of complexity.Bruce E. Hesse & Gary Novak - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):540-541.
Multiply concurrent replication.David L. Hull & Sigrid S. Glenn - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):902-904.
Operant behavior and the thesis of “selection by consequences”.J. Moore - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):546-547.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-18

Downloads
12 (#1,090,149)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references