The Perverted Faculty Argument

Philosophia Christi 19 (1):207-216 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is an old argument rooted in the classical natural law tradition that says that the “perverse” or “unnatural” use of a human faculty is immoral. This short essay offers a derivation, overview, and brief defense of this “perverted faculty” argument. I shall argue that the PFA is entailed by some commonsense theses about the nature of goodness.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The myth of the moral faculty: Response to Kirkby.Mark Johnson - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology (4):1-5.
Faculty disputes.John Collins - 2004 - Mind and Language 19 (5):503-33.
Kant on genius and art.Bradley Murray - 2007 - British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (2):199-214.
Does Humanity Share a Common Moral Faculty? Smith - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (1):37-53.
College Faculty Professionalism: Ethical Responsibility And Precarious Work.Chris Nagel - 2014 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 21 (1):12-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-10

Downloads
112 (#159,467)

6 months
19 (#138,312)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tim Hsiao
University of Arkansas Grantham

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references