Two letters of Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kühn on a draft of the structure of scientific revolutions

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 26 (3):353-387 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/0039-3681(95)00005-8

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

More letters by Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kuhn on Proto-Structure.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (4):610-632.
Paul Feyerabend und Thomas Kuhn.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2002 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (1):61-83.
Thomas Kuhn on revolution and Paul Feyerabend on anarchy.Thomas J. Hickey - 2005 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (1):102-114.
Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 1993 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn’s Development Before and After Structure.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2015 - In William J. Devlin & Alisa Bokulich (eds.), Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On. Cham: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 311. Springer.
Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions. Thomas S. Kuhn's Philosophy of Science.[author unknown] - 1994 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 56 (2):374-375.
Thomas Kuhn and the chemical revolution.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
Thomas Kuhn und die Wissenschaftsgeschichte†.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2001 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 24 (1):1-12.
Scientific Revolutions: A Philosophical Critique of the Theories of Science of Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend.Eugene M. Lashchyk - 1969 - Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania
Discussion: Kuhn’s Evolutionary Analogy in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and “The Road since Structure”.Thomas Reydon & Paul Hoyningen-Heune - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (3):468-476.
Five Decades of Structure.Juan V. Mayoral - 2012 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27 (3):261-280.
Paul Hoyningen-Huene, Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn's Philosophy of Science. Trans. Alexander T. Levine. Foreword by Thomas S. Kuhn Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Alexander Rueger - 1995 - Philosophy in Review 15 (1):46-48.
Recensioni-Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions. Thomas Kuhn's Philosophy of Science.Paul Hoyningen-Huene & S. Gattei - 2000 - Epistemologia 23 (1):169-170.
Thomas Kuhn's cottage.Alex Levine - 2010 - Perspectives on Science 18 (3):369-377.
Discussion: Kuhn’s Evolutionary Analogy in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and “The Road since Structure”.Thomas A. C. Reydon & Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (3):468-476.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
121 (#150,208)

6 months
9 (#320,420)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Hoyningen-Huene
Universität Hannover

Citations of this work

Was Feyerabend an anarchist? The structure(s) of ‘anything goes’.Jamie Shaw - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 64:11-21.
Reconsidering Feyerabend’s “Anarchism‘.Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2003 - Perspectives on Science 11 (2):208-235.
Introduction: Reappraising Paul Feyerabend.Matthew J. Brown & Ian James Kidd - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 57:1-8.

View all 34 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references