Perky, phenomenal similarity and photographs: reply to Nanay

Analysis 73 (1):77-80 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent paper, I argue that Perky’s famous experiments do not show what they are often taken to show. Bence Nanay has criticised my argument on two grounds. I argue against both his lines of objection

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Perky did not show.Robert Hopkins - 2012 - Analysis 72 (3):431-439.
Ambiguous figures, attention, and perceptual content: reply to Jagnow.Bence Nanay - 2011 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (4):557-561.
Reply to Bence Nanay’s ‘Natural selection and the limited nature of environmental resources’.Ulrich Stegmann - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (4):420-421.
Modality and Function: Reply to Nanay.Osamu Kiritani - 2011 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 32 (2):89-90.
Function, modality, mental content.Bence Nanay - 2011 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 32 (2):84-87.
The phenomenal concept strategy.Peter Carruthers & Benedicte Veillet - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (9-10):212-236.
Similarity After Goodman.Lieven Decock & Igor Douven - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (1):61-75.
Function and Modality.Osamu Kiritani - 2011 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 32 (1):1-4.
New Essays on the Philosophy of Perception.Bence Nanay (ed.) - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Marginal Humans, The Argument From Kinds, And The Similarity Argument.Julia Tanner - 2006 - Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 5 (1):47-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-13

Downloads
131 (#141,296)

6 months
22 (#125,924)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Hopkins
New York University

References found in this work

Seeing-in and seeming to see.R. Hopkins - 2012 - Analysis 72 (4):650-659.
What Perky did not show.Robert Hopkins - 2012 - Analysis 72 (3):431-439.

Add more references