Projection, physical intelligibility, objectivity and completeness: The divergent ideals of Bohr and Einstein

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (4):491-511 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is shown how the development of physics has involved making explicit what were homocentric projections which had heretofore been implicit, indeed inexpressible in theory. This is shown to support a particular notion of the invariant as the real. On this basis the divergence in ideals of physical intelligibility between Bohr and Einstein is set out. This in turn leads to divergent, but explicit, conceptions of objectivity and completeness for physical theory. *I am indebted to Dr. G. McLelland. Professor F. Rohrlich and an anonymous referee of this journal for several improvements in the formulation of the paper.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Objectivity, Causality and Ideology in Modern Physics.Derek Lovejoy - 1999 - Science and Society 63 (4):433 - 458.
The description of nature: Niels Bohr and the philosophy of quantum physics.John Honner - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Niels Bohr.
Niels Bohr's philosophy of physics.Dugald Murdoch - 1987 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Modern physics and problems of knowledge.Paul M. Clark (ed.) - 1981 - Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Constructing the myth of the copenhagen interpretation.Kristian Camilleri - 2009 - Perspectives on Science 17 (1):pp. 26-57.
The Projection Postulate and Bohr's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Paul Teller - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:201-223.
The Einstein-podolsky-Rosen paradox re-examined.David H. Sharp - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (3):225-233.
When champions meet: Rethinking the Bohr–Einstein debate.Nicolaas P. Landsman - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (1):212-242.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
150 (#128,781)

6 months
18 (#152,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The origin of the Everettian heresy.Stefano Osnaghi, Fábio Freitas & Olival Freire - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (2):97-123.
When champions meet: Rethinking the Bohr–Einstein debate.Nicolaas P. Landsman - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (1):212-242.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism, and the Quantum Theory.Arthur Fine - 1986 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wholeness and the Implicate Order.David Bohm - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (3):303-305.

View all 29 references / Add more references