Milton’s Thomistic Distinction: On the Usefulness of the Distinction Between Mistake and Error in ‘Samson Agonistes’

In Andreas Speer & Maxime Mauriège (eds.), Irrtum – Error – Erreur (Miscellanea Mediaevalia Band 40). Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 743-756 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tragic Freedom in Samson Agonistes.Warren Chernaik - 2012 - The European Legacy 17 (2):197 - 211.
Dr. Christian Edgard Kreipe : Milton's Samson Agonistes. [REVIEW]Franz De Backer - 1928 - Revue Belge de Philologie Et D’Histoire 7 (1):199-200.
Spectacle and Evidence in "Samson Agonistes".Stanley Fish - 1989 - Critical Inquiry 15 (3):556-586.
Kant and Milton.Sanford Budick - 2010 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Uses of the Person-Nature Distinction in Thomas's Christology.Michael Gorman - 2000 - Recherches de Theologie Et Philosophie Medievales 67 (1):58-79.
What's New in Ockham's Formal Distinction?Michael Jordan - 1985 - Franciscan Studies 45 (1):97-110.
The uses and abuses of the personal/subpersonal distinction.Zoe Drayson - 2012 - Philosophical Perspectives 26 (1):1-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-15

Downloads
15 (#953,629)

6 months
6 (#531,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Giora Hon
University of Haifa

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references