Electroconvulsive therapy as an ethical dilemma

Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 4 (3-4):165-180 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), an efficient psychiatric treatment method, is one of the most controversial and the most stigmatized therapeutic approaches in medicine. ECT uses transcranial electrical impulses to induce artificial epileptiform paroxysm. For the first time it was used in 1938 by Italian neuro-psychiatrists Ugo Cerletti and Lucio Bini in treatment of schizophrenia. Efficacy of the method was proven in clinical practice, clinical studies and meta-analyses. ECT is the most efficient in the treatment of mood disorders and in lesser extent in some other disorders. Important advance in ECT was the introduction of anaesthesia and muscle relaxation. It reduced adverse effect incidence and severity. Currently, ECT is associated mostly with anaesthesia adverse effects. Other adverse reactions include muscle pain, headache, prolonged paroxysm, cardiopulmonary complications. The most discussed and the most disturbing adverse effect is memory impairment which is usually transient. Incidence and severity of adverse effects is comparable to other therapeutic modalities. Examining the available information it appears, that modern practice of ECT in Europe (European Union member states) and USA is, apart from a few exceptions, in accordance with principles of beneficence and to some extent with autonomy and nonmaleficence. In many countries, the principle of justice is not respected – either because of limited availability or restrictive laws. In the Czech Republic the problem is non-existence of codified treatment guidelines and insufficient training of medical specialists. Aside from this, position of ECT in the Czech Republic is similar to that in the rest of Europe and in USA.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does electroconvulsive therapy cause brain damage?Richard D. Weiner - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (1):1-22.
Electroconvulsive therapy and the fear of deviance.James Giles - 2002 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32 (1):61–87.
Consent for anesthesia for procedures with special societal implications: psychosurgery and electroconvulsive therapy.Sadek Beloucif - 2010 - In G. A. van Norman, S. Jackson, S. H. Rosenbaum & S. K. Palmer (eds.), Clinical Ethics in Anesthesiology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 55.
Placebos in clinical practice and research.P. P. De Deyn & R. D'Hooge - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (3):140-146.
Some perspectives on electroconvulsive therapy.T. George Bidder - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (1):22-23.
Electroconvulsive therapy, pharmacotherapy, and psychotherapy.L. Salzman - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (1):33-33.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references