Expert witnesses in legal argumentation

Argumentation 9 (3):489-502 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00733154

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,674

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Arguing About Goals: The Diminishing Scope of Legal Reasoning. [REVIEW]Pauline Westerman - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (2):211-226.
Guest editorial: Reclaiming the integrity of science in expert witnessing.Bruce D. Sales & Daniel W. Shuman - 1993 - Ethics and Behavior 3 (3 & 4):223 – 229.
Institutional constraints on the ethics of expert testimony.Bruce Sales & Leonore Simon - 1993 - Ethics and Behavior 3 (3 & 4):231 – 249.
The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion.Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):329-339.
Expert statistical testimony and epidemiological evidence: The toxic effects of lead exposure on children.Richard Scheines - unknown
Legal Practices and the Reason of the Law.Kurt Nutting - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (1):111-133.
A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):349-367.
Ethical concerns of nonclinical forensic witnesses and consultants.Jeffrey Pfeifer & John Brigham - 1993 - Ethics and Behavior 3 (3 & 4):329 – 343.
Legal implications in development and use of expert systems in agriculture.Willard Downs & Kelley Ann Newton - 1989 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2 (1):53-58.
Expertise, Argumentation, and the End of Inquiry.Axel Gelfert - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):297-312.
Unwarranted assumptions about children's testimonial accuracy.Steven Ceci, Sarah Kulkofskey, J. Zoe Klemfuss, Charlotte D. Sweeney & Maggie Bruck - manuscript
Argument from Expert Opinion as Legal Evidence: Critical Questions and Admissibility Criteria of Expert Testimony in the American Legal System.David M. Godden & Douglas Walton - 2006 - Ratio Juris 19 (3):261-286.
Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: An approach to legal logic. [REVIEW]Bart Verheij - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):167-195.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-17

Downloads
49 (#331,197)

6 months
4 (#843,989)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Legal Reasoning.Martin Philip Golding - 1983 - Alfred a Knopf.

Add more references