Endowment effects in the risky investment game?

Theory and Decision 92 (1):259-274 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The risky investment game of Gneezy and Potters :631–645, 1997) has been proposed as a simple tool to measure risk aversion in applied settings, especially attractive in settings where participants may have limited education. However, this game can produce a significant endowment effect, so that analysis of the behavior in this game should not be done in the Expected Utility Theory framework. The paper illustrates this point, by showing that risk tolerance can be much higher when the initial endowment concerns a risky lottery.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Coordination in an email game without ``almost common knowledge''.Nicola Dimitri - 2003 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (1):1-11.
Counting on numbers.Peter Baumann - 2009 - Analysis 69 (3):446-448.
Dynamic Choice, Independence and Emotions.Astrid Hopfensitz & Frans Van Winden - 2008 - Theory and Decision 64 (2-3):249-300.
Another Rawls Game.Gregg Lubritz - 1999 - Teaching Philosophy 22 (3):275-280.
Risk and Austrian business‐cycle theory: Rejoinder to Cowen.J. Barkley Rosser - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (1):95-97.
Relative Expectation Theory.Mark Colyvan - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy 105 (1):37-44.
Concerns for the poorly off in ordering risky prospects.Luc Bovens - 2015 - Economics and Philosophy 31 (3):397-429.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-14

Downloads
8 (#1,321,511)

6 months
6 (#528,006)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?