Developing Assessment Procedures and Assessing Two Models of Escalation Behavior among Community College Administrators

Theory and Decision 49 (1):1-24 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Escalation behavior occurs when individual decision-makers repeatedly invest time, money, and other resources into a failing project. A conceptual model of escalation behavior based on project, organizational, social and psychological forces was developed, and a 75-item measurement instrument was constructed to assess the various dimensions. The model was tested using data collected from a random sample of North Carolina Community College administrators. A LISREL measurement model analysis provided support for the four escalation forces. Two structural models were tested, leading to support for a mediational model for escalation behavior. The most important contributor to Escalation was the Psychological force

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Development of a Model For Describing The Ethical Climate of a Business Community.Robert P. Marble & Beverly Kracher - 2009 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:12-16.
Is there more to “model” than “muddle”?Matthias Scheutz - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1076-1077.
Learning causality in a complex world: understandings of consequence.Tina Grotzer - 2012 - Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Robots aren't the only physical models.Peter E. Midford - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1069-1070.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
60 (#269,728)

6 months
5 (#648,315)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.D. Kahneman & A. Tversky - 1979 - Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society:263--291.

Add more references