Making our own luck

Ratio 20 (3):278–292 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It has been contended that we can never be truly responsible for anything we do: we do what we do because of the way we are, so we cannot be responsible for what we do unless we are responsible for the way we are; and we cannot be responsible for the way we are when we first make decisions in life, so we can never become responsible for the way we are later in life. This article argues that in our consciously chosen actions we respond rationally to whole ‘gestalt’ experiences in ways that cannot be pre determined by pre choice circumstances and laws of nature and/or computational rules; and that this means we are partly responsible for what we do, even if we are not responsible for the way we are.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#484,982)

6 months
3 (#978,111)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The knowledge argument: A response to Elizabeth Schier.David Hodgson - 2008 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (4):112-115.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references