The skeleton in Frege's cupboard: The standard versus nonstandard distinction

Journal of Philosophy 89 (6):290-315 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Against some very common views (e.g. Dummett), this paper argues that Frege did not have a standard interpretation of higher-order logic and for this reason his programme in the foundations of mathematics was a nonstarter.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
100 (#175,444)

6 months
13 (#204,126)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gabriel Sandu
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

Frege's proof of referentiality.Øystein Linnebo - 2004 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 45 (2):73-98.
Frege, Dedekind, and the Origins of Logicism.Erich H. Reck - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (3):242-265.
Completeness and categoricity: Frege, gödel and model theory.Stephen Read - 1997 - History and Philosophy of Logic 18 (2):79-93.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references