Interdisciplinarity and boundary work: challenges and opportunities for agrifood studies

Agriculture and Human Values 25 (2):209-213 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Despite its vigor, agrifood studies research faces two fault lines: the durability of disciplines, and challenges in engaging non-academic stakeholders. In this essay, I use the concept of boundary work from social studies of science and technology to reflect on the challenges and opportunities for more engaged interdisciplinary research in agrifood studies. I draw on recent field visits to several “sustainable food chain” research projects funded through the Rural Economy and Land Use Programme (RELU), an innovative interdisciplinary research initiative of the UK Research Councils, to highlight the contradictory nature of boundary work in interdisciplinary research. Involving efforts both to bridge interfaces and to separate, exclude and manage other disciplines or stakeholders, boundary work is inherent to interdisciplinarity. Innovations in the organizational culture of projects and in the larger structural context for research can multiply the more generative potential of boundary work, and also yield more and better interdisciplinary research in agrifood studies

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The doctors of agrifood studies.Douglas H. Constance - 2023 - Agriculture and Human Values 40 (1):31-43.
On Some Limits of Interdisciplinarity.Andrew P. Carlin - 2016 - Social Epistemology 30 (5-6):624-642.
The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity.Robert Frodeman (ed.) - 2010 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
33 (#499,808)

6 months
2 (#1,259,303)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The doctors of agrifood studies.Douglas H. Constance - 2023 - Agriculture and Human Values 40 (1):31-43.
The paradox of scientific expertise: A perspectivist approach to knowledge asymmetries.Hugo Fjelsted Alrøe & Egon Noe - 2011 - Fachsprache - International Journal of Specialized Communication (3–4):152-167.
Money for Nothing: Are Decoupled Agricultural Subsidies Just?Daniel Pilchman - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (6):1105-1125.

Add more citations