German aesthetics as a response to Kant's 'Third Critique': The thought of Friedrich Schiller, Friedrich Holderlin and Friedrich Schlegel in the 1790s

Abstract

This thesis is about the way aesthetic thought changed or developed in Germany in the years immediately after the publication of Immanuel Kant's third critique - A Critique of the Power of Judgement. Besides many comparatively minor developments, it identifies three important changes in aesthetic thinking after Kant. Firstly, there was an increased emphasis on the integrated and interdependent nature of the human thinking that Kant had been more concerned to classify and analyse. Secondly, the change in aesthetics marks the change from Enlightenment classicism to Early German Romanticism. Thirdly, the role of aesthetics itself changed, from attempting to define the concept of beauty and explain how we perceive it, to claiming that aesthetics is concerned with humanity's search for meaning in the work of art. This last development amounts to a suggestion that the hermeneutic strand in philosophy grew out of early post-Kantian aesthetics. Three thinkers have been selected as a means of showing these changes. They are Friedrich Schiller, the poet and dramatist, Friedrich Holderlin, the poet, and Friedrich Schlegel, the literary theorist and essayist. Chronologically, our period begins in 1793 and ends about 1800, just before the death of Kant, the death of Schiller, the mental collapse of Holderlin, and with the final editions of Schlegel's literary journal, Athendum. This timespan allows a fairly close study of Schiller's influential series of essays on philosophical aesthetics, which he wrote in direct response to the Third Critique, re-examining Kant's claim that the judgement of taste is subjective, and expanding Kant's account of how it is possible to create works of art and also of Friedrich Holderlin's and Friedrich Schlegel's most productive years, when both worked out aesthetic theories that moved onwards from Schiller, but nevertheless remained indebted to Kant in several respects.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Hölderlin in jena.Jacques Taminiaux - 2005 - Ideas Y Valores 54 (128):89-103.
Schiller as philosopher: a re-examination.Frederick C. Beiser - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
On the aesthetic education of man.Friedrich Schiller - 1954 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. Edited by Reginald Snell.
Circular Art of Life.Martin Klebes - 2008 - Idealistic Studies 38 (3):193-207.
Being judgement possibility.Friedrich Hölderlin - 2003 - In J. M. Bernstein (ed.), Classic and Romantic German Aesthetics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 191--192.
On the aesthetic education of man: in a series of letters.Friedrich Schiller - 1954 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Elizabeth M. Wilkinson & L. A. Willoughby.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-16

Downloads
14 (#997,118)

6 months
1 (#1,478,856)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How to do things with words.John Langshaw Austin - 1962 - Oxford [Eng.]: Clarendon Press. Edited by Marina Sbisá & J. O. Urmson.
Friedrich Schlegel, Romanticism, and the Re‐enchantment of Nature.Alison Stone - 2005 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):3 – 25.
Kant, teleology, and evolution.Daniel Kolb - 1992 - Synthese 91 (1-2):9 - 28.
Philosophical aesthetics: An overview.Jerrold Levinson - 2003 - In The Oxford handbook of aesthetics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 3--24.

View all 14 references / Add more references