- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Good knowledge, bad knowledge: on two dogmas of epistemology
New York: Oxford University Press (2001)
Abstract
What is knowledge? How hard is it for a person to have knowledge? Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge confronts contemporary philosophical attempts to answer those classic questions, offering a theory of knowledge that is unique in conceiving of knowledge in a non-absolutist way.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of Stephen Hetherington, Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology. [REVIEW]Richard Feldman - 2002 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (8).
Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology.Bruce W. Brower - 2004 - International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):107-108.
Phenomenal epistemology: What is consciousness that we may know it so well?Terry Horgan & Uriah Kriegel - 2007 - Philosophical Issues 17 (1):123-144.
The Distinction between Knowledge-That and Knowledge-How.Huiming Ren - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (4):857-875.
5.Stephen Hetherington - 2006 - In How to Know (That Knowledge-That is Knowledge-How). Oxford University Press. pp. 71-94.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
183 (#106,604)
6 months
17 (#145,948)
2009-01-28
Downloads
183 (#106,604)
6 months
17 (#145,948)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Reliabilism and the Value of Knowledge.Alvin I. Goldman & Erik J. Olsson - 2009 - In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Epistemic value. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 19-41.
What's the Point of Understanding?Michael Hannon - 2019 - In What's the Point of Knowledge? A Function-First Epistemology. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-55b469568f-qf88s uwo