Pus and PAS: the 'Democracy question' in science studies [Book Review]

Metascience 7 (2):313-316 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2008

DOI

10.1007/bf02912810

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Expert Knowledge, Democracy and Science.E. P. Hamm - 2004 - Metascience 13 (1):59-66.
Talking About Assembling Science and Democracy.David Turnbull - 2005 - Metascience 14 (2):273-275.
Controlling Biotechnology: Science, Democracy and 'Civic Epistemology'. [REVIEW]Yaron Ezrahi - 2008 - Metascience 17 (2):177-198.
Author's response: David gooding: The tacit, the visual, and the simulated.Peter Galison - 1999 - Metascience 8 (3):393-404.
Science communication: A growth area in science and technology studies. [REVIEW]Rosaleen Love - 1998 - Metascience 7 (2):281-289.
Tame Technology Studies.Graeme Gooday - 2008 - Metascience 17 (1):95-97.
Vitalising The History Of Science.Richard C. Sha - 2006 - Metascience 15 (3):587-590.
David Healy, The Creation of Psychopharmacology. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002. [REVIEW]Hans Pols - 2003 - Metascience 12 (3):378-380.
Kabbalistic philosophy of science?Sarah J. Kattau - 2001 - Metascience 10 (1):22-31.
Picturing biology.Robert C. Olby, Judy Johns Schloegel & Karen Rader - 1999 - Metascience 8 (2):243-260.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
16 (#933,560)

6 months
4 (#862,849)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Science.Steve Fuller - 1997 - Minneapolis: Routledge.

Add more references