Comments on the Papers of David Bloor and Steven Lukes

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 13 (4):325 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comments on David Bloor.Steven Lukes - 1982 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 13 (4):313.
Reply to Steven Lukes.David Bloor - 1982 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 13 (4):319.
Gender and philosophy of science: The case of Mary Hesse.Margareta Hallberg - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (2):333-340.
Editorial Response to David Bloor.Gerd Buchdahl - 1982 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 13 (4):299.
Primitive Classification and the Sociology of Knowledge: A Response to Bloor.Joseph Wayne Smith - 1983 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 15 (3):237.
Concepts, anomalies and reality: a response to Bloor and Fehér.Stephen Kemp - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (1):241-253.
A Reply To David Bloor.John Worrall - 1979 - British Journal for the History of Science 12 (1):71-81.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
34 (#484,550)

6 months
7 (#491,772)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Bloor's bluff: Behaviourism and the strong programme.Peter Slezak - 1991 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (3):241 – 256.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references