Kants Modell kausaler Verhältnisse

Kant Studien 102 (3):367-384 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Eric Watkins argues that according to Kant, causation is not a relation between two events, but a relation between the “causality” of a substance and an event. It is shown that his arguments are partly based on a confusion between causation and interaction. Further, Watkins claims that for Kant, causes cannot be temporally determined. If this were true, it would follow that there can be no causal chains, and that all factors that determine the time when an effect occurs do not belong to its cause. However, it is not true. In order to understand Kant, one must distinguish between causation, action, and interaction. When two substances interact, each of them does something (an event), which causes something to happen to the other one.

Similar books and articles

Monadic Interaction.Stephen Puryear - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (5):763-796.
Kant's model of causality: Causal powers, laws, and Kant's reply to Hume.Eric Watkins - 2004 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (4):449-488.
Causation in a new old key.Uwe Meixner - 2004 - Studia Logica 76 (3):343 - 383.
The irreducibility of causation.Richard Swinburne - 1997 - Dialectica 51 (1):79–92.
Against the Contrastive Account of Singular Causation.Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (1):115-143.
Mental causation without downward causation.John Gibbons - 2006 - Philosophical Review 115 (1):79-103.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-10-03

Downloads
209 (#97,591)

6 months
55 (#85,217)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Boris Hennig
Ryerson University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references