Cognitive Impairment in Non-critical, Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Survivors

Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ImportancePrevious studies of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome have focused on critical cases with severe disease. However, most cases are mild to moderate in disease severity.ObjectiveWe aimed to examine cognitive outcomes in cases of non-critical, mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 72 adults aged 22 to 65 years in Central Texas who had non-critical, mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection between 13 January 2021 and 20 April 2021.Main Outcomes and MeasuresWe remotely administered cognitive-behavioral testing to determine the frequency of cognitive impairment and examine demographic, clinical, and psychosocial contributors to impairment.ResultsThe frequency of objective cognitive impairment was 40%. The largest number of participants showed impairment on a measure of executive functioning. Attention and processing speed was more impaired in males. Males endorsed lower adherence to social distancing guidelines, which was in turn associated with cognitive impairment across participants. Younger age was correlated with impairment but was also associated with racial/ethnic minority status and increased psychological symptoms. Moderate COVID-19 severity was associated with attention/processing speed impairment, increased pain, and higher number of COVID-19 symptoms.Conclusion and RelevanceMild or moderate COVID-19 infection may be associated with cognitive impairments, especially in the domain of executive functioning. A subgroup of younger individuals may be more vulnerable to cognitive and psychosocial effects of COVID-19.HighlightsQuestion: How frequent is cognitive impairment among non-critical, mild-to-moderate COVID-19 survivors?FindingsIn this cross-sectional study of 72 adults, 40% demonstrated cognitive impairment, particularly in executive function.MeaningNeurologic sequelae, such as cognitive impairment, may be common following COVID-19 infection.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Under the floorboards: Examining the foundations of mild cognitive impairment.Michael Bavidge - 2006 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 13 (1):75-77.
The Ambiguities of Mild Cognitive Impairment.Tim Thornton - 2006 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 13 (1):21-27.
Mild cognitive impairment: Where does it go from here?John Bond & Lynne Corner - 2006 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 13 (1):29-30.
Feminist Bioethics Perspectives on "Long-COVID Syndrome".Catherine Villanueva Gardner - 2022 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 15 (1):189-191.
A classification system for post-acute sequelae of Sars cov-2 infection.Leonard A. Jason & Mohammed F. Islam - 2022 - Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics 3 (1):38-51.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-09

Downloads
8 (#1,325,033)

6 months
6 (#531,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references