Context, Equality, and Aboriginal Compensation Claims

Dialogue 50 (4):669-688 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jeremy Waldron argues that the historical ownership rights of Aboriginal peoples can be superseded, yet acknowledges that programs of historically grounded compensation are justifiable in the absence of widespread redistribution. This article argues that existing states lack social justice programs of the requisite kind, and that they will continue to do so in the foreseeable future. Moreover, even the best-designed programs will be far more ambiguous than Waldron encourages us to recognize, given the unavoidability of inheritance-based inequalities. The article argues that philosophers should pay special attention to political context when evaluating the claims of socially vulnerable populations such as Aboriginal peoples.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A model capturing ethics and executive compensation.Waymond Rodgers & Susana Gago - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 48 (2):189-202.
Compensation vs. Fair Equality of Opportunity.Nani L. Ranken - 1986 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 3 (1):111-122.
An ethical perspective on CEO compensation.Mel Perel - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 48 (4):381-391.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-31

Downloads
23 (#701,105)

6 months
6 (#581,183)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Why indigenous land rights have not been superseded – a critical application of Waldron’s theory of supersession.Kerstin Reibold - 2022 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 25 (4):480-495.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references