A Companion to the Study of St. Anselm [Book Review]

Philosophical Review 83 (4):547-548 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2183924

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Anselm of Canterbury: Works. [REVIEW]Desmond Paul Henry - 1978 - Philosophical Review 87 (3):476-479.
A Companion to the Study of St. Anselm. [REVIEW]E. M. W. - 1973 - Review of Metaphysics 27 (2):390-391.
From Belief to Understanding, A Study of Anselm's Proslogion Argument on the Existence of God.William J. Wainwright & Richard Campbell - 1978 - Philosophical Review 87 (2):329.
Existence, Predication, and Anselm.Patricia Crawford - 1966 - The Monist 50 (1):109-124.
The empirical basis of Anselm's arguments.Henry G. Wolz - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (3):341-361.
The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. [REVIEW]Jon McGinnis - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 60 (1):148-150.
Stotus, Malcolm, and Anselm.Frederick Scott - 1965 - The Monist 49 (4):634-638.
Anselm and gaunilo on the 'lost island'.Stephen T. Davis - 1975 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 13 (4):435-448.
Anselm and Gaunilo on the ‘Lost Island’.Stephen T. Davis - 1975 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 13 (4):435-448.
Anselm's ontological arguments.Norman Malcolm - 1960 - Philosophical Review 69 (1):41-62.
The Logic of Saint Anselm.Ernest A. Moody - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (2):274.
On conceivability in Anselm and Malcolm.Gareth B. Matthews - 1961 - Philosophical Review 70 (1):110-111.
The logical structure of Anselm's arguments.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1971 - Philosophical Review 80 (1):28-54.
Anselm's Discovery: A Re-Examination of the OntoLogical Proof for God's Existence.Alvin Plantinga - 1969 - Philosophical Review 78 (3):405.
Proslogion II and III: A Third Interpretation of Anselm's Argument.Jonathan Barnes & Richard R. La Croix - 1975 - Philosophical Review 84 (1):135.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-22

Downloads
6 (#1,480,458)

6 months
6 (#582,229)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references