Response to Comments

Review of Metaphysics 5 (4):628 - 629 (1952)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

2. Experiental sentences might be expressed in a phenomenalistic or in some "material-object" idiom. In the latter case, it is preferable to construe them as attributing directly observable properties or relations to physical objects, rather than in the manner of "Smith sensed red at 5 pm"; for agreement among observers is much more readily obtained in regard to sentences of the former type; hence they are better qualified to represent a common, and fairly stable, basis of intersubjective empirical knowledge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Comments.James F. Anderson - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 5 (3):469 - 472.
Response to Comments.Brand Blanshard Terrell & Irwin C. Lieb - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (4):652-655.
Response to Comments.Francis V. Raab - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (1):130 - 131.
Response to Comments.Richard Taylor - 1954 - Review of Metaphysics 7 (4):689 - 693.
Response to Comments.Konstantin Kolenda - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 10 (1):118 - 121.
Response to Comments.David Harrah - 1955 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (1):125 - 128.
Response to Comments.Paul Weiss - 1955 - Review of Metaphysics 8 (4):682 - 684.
Response to Comments.Donald Walhout - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (4):652 - 655.
Response to Comments.Newton P. Stallknecht - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (3):481 - 484.
Response to comments.J. P. Hirth - 2014 - Philosophical Magazine 94 (27):3177-3182.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
11 (#1,165,043)

6 months
3 (#1,045,430)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references