The self‐deception of economics

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 12 (1-2):139-150 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Formalization has led contemporary economics to turn its back on the study of capitalism as the social order to which it owes its origins and its intrinsic analytical focus. As a consequence, contemporary economics turns a blind eye to the empirical analysis of capital accumulation, the real‐world properties of markets, and the bifurcation of political power that endow capitalism with its unique historical properties. Instead, economics takes scientific, not social, analysis as its model, a view that gives an ideological cast to its findings.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-18

Downloads
15 (#953,911)

6 months
2 (#1,206,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Formalism and contemporary economics: A reply to Hausman, Heilbroner, and Mayer.Peter J. Boettke - 1998 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 12 (1-2):173-186.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Wealth of Nations.Adam Smith - 1976 - Hackett Publishing Company.
Where did economics go wrong? Modern economics as a flight from reality.Peter J. Boettke - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (1):11-64.
Where did economics go wrong? Modern economics as a flight from reality.Peter J. Boettke - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (1):11-64.

Add more references