Reflection of Long Game Formulas

Mathematical Logic Quarterly 40 (3):381-392 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We study game formulas the truth of which is determined by a semantical game of uncountable length. The main theme is the study of principles stating reflection of these formulas in various admissible sets. This investigation leads to two weak forms of strict-II11 reflection . We show that admissible sets such as H and Lω2 which fail to have strict-II11 reflection, may or may not, depending on set-theoretic hypotheses satisfy one or both of these weaker forms

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Ehrenfeucht‐Fraïssé game for Lω1ω.Jouko Väänänen & Tong Wang - 2013 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 59 (4-5):357-370.
Coinductive formulas and a many-sorted interpolation theorem.Ursula Gropp - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (3):937-960.
Game logic and its applications I.Mamoru Kaneko & Takashi Nagashima - 1996 - Studia Logica 57 (2-3):325 - 354.
Epistemic Operators in Dependence Logic.Pietro Galliani - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (2):367-397.
Game-theoretical semantics: insights and prospects.Jaakko Hintikka - 1982 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23 (2):219-241.
Game theory and rational decision.Julius Sensat - 1997 - Erkenntnis 47 (3):379-410.
Infinitary logic and admissible sets.Jon Barwise - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (2):226-252.
HC of an admissible set.Sy D. Friedman - 1979 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 44 (1):95-102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
16 (#928,967)

6 months
3 (#1,034,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jouko A Vaananen
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations