A Survey of University Institutional Review Boards: Characteristics, Policies, and Procedures

, &
IRB: Ethics & Human Research 17 (3):1 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/3563605

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

How research ethics boards are undermining survey research on canadian university students.J. Paul Grayson & Richard Myles - 2005 - Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (4):293-314.
Women and Multiple Board Memberships: Social Capital and Institutional Pressure.Alessandra Rigolini & Morten Huse - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 169 (3):443-459.
Confidentiality and Electronic Surveys: How IRBs Address Ethical and Technical Issues.Timothy Baker - 2012 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34 (5):8-15.
Female Institutional Directors on Boards and Firm Value.María Consuelo Pucheta-Martínez, Inmaculada Bel-Oms & Gustau Olcina-Sempere - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 152 (2):343-363.
Operational Characteristics of Institutional Review Boards in the United States.Genevieve L. Nesom, Iraklis Petrof & Tyler M. Moore - forthcoming - AJOB Empirical Bioethics:1-11.
Juggling through hoops: Implementing ethics policies in applied language studies. [REVIEW]Janna Fox, Natasha Artemeva, Richard Darville & Devon Woods - 2006 - Journal of Academic Ethics 4 (1-4):77-99.
Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues.Elizabeth A. Buchanan & Charles M. Ess - 2009 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 39 (3):43-49.
Determining the Costs of Institutional Review Boards.Jeanne Speckman - 2007 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 29 (2).
Institutional Barriers to Research on Sensitive Topics: Case of Sex Communication Research Among University Students.Carey M. Noland - 2012 - Journal of Research Practice 8 (1):Article - M2.
Women board directors: Characteristics of the few. [REVIEW]Zena Burgess & Phyllis Tharenou - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 37 (1):39 - 49.
Contrasting institutional review boards with institutional ethics committees.Leonard H. Glantz - 1984 - In Ronald E. Cranford & A. Edward Doudera (eds.), Institutional Ethics Committees and Health Care Decision Making. Health Administration Press.
Toward a More Comprehensive Approach to Protecting Human Subjects: The Interface of Data Safety Monitoring Boards and Institutional Review Boards in Randomized Clinical Trials.Valery M. Gordon, Jeremy Sugarman & Nancy Kass - 1998 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 20 (1):1.
Toward a More Comprehensive Approach to Protecting Human Subjects: The Interface of Data Safety Monitoring Boards and Institutional Review Boards in Randomized Clinical Trials.Valery M. Gordon, Jeremy Sugarman & Nancy Kass - 1998 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 20 (1):1.
Ethics Issues with Private Research Ethics Boards: A Breakout Session at the 2009 NCEHR National Conference. [REVIEW]Francis Rolleston, Jack Corman, Serge Gauthier, Paddi O’Hara & Rod Schmaltz - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):69-73.
Research ethics committees: A regional approach.Cheryl Cox Macpherson - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (2):161-179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-28

Downloads
16 (#913,262)

6 months
14 (#188,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Valuing risk: The ethical review of clinical trial safety.Jonathan Kimmelman - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (4):369-393.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references