Time and History in Theological Ethics: The Work of James Gustafson

Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (1):3 - 21 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay traces Gustafson's understanding of the methodological significance of history and time for theological ethics. I argue that Gustafson qualifies his original thoroughgoing historicist perspective in the interest of developing a natural theology and ethics. His continuing emphasis on a historical perspective, I suggest, is best understood by attending to his recommendation that the theologian's task is best captured by the image of the "participant.".

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gustafson's God: Who? What? Where? (etc.).Richard A. McCormick - 1985 - Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (1):53 - 70.
Theology and Christian ethics.James M. Gustafson - 1974 - Philadelphia,: United Church Press.
Ritschl's Critique of Schleiermacher's Theological Ethics.James M. Brandt - 1989 - Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (2):51 - 72.
Mere History: The Place of Historical Studies in Theological Ethics.Jean Porter - 1997 - Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (3):103 - 126.
Theological Ethics and The Naturalistic Fallacy.John P. Crossley Jr - 1978 - Journal of Religious Ethics 6 (1):121 - 134.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
17 (#874,906)

6 months
1 (#1,478,856)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Exemplarity Between Tradition and Critique.Jennifer A. Herdt - 2019 - Journal of Religious Ethics 47 (3):552-565.
Hauerwas among the virtues.Jennifer A. Herdt - 2012 - Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (2):202-227.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references