Human language: Are nonhuman precursors lacking?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):190-191 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contra Wilkins & Wakefield, we argue that an evolutionarily inspired approach to language must consider different facets of language (i.e., more than syntax and semantics), and must explore the possibility of nonhuman precursors. Several examples are discussed, illustrating the power of the comparative approach in illuminating our understanding of language evolution

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The hominid tool-language connection: Some missing evolutionary links?A. Maryanski - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):199-200.
Issues and nonissues in the origins of language.Wendy K. Wilkins & Jennie Wakefield - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):205-226.
Aspects of human language: Where motherese?Emmanuel Gilissen - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):514-514.
An evolutionary model for the learning of language.Jechil S. Sieratzki & Bencie Woll - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):530-530.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
26 (#612,956)

6 months
9 (#313,570)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations