Scrutiny of Einstein’s Causality

Abstract

In the present paper, the so-called Einstein’s causality is scrutinized and proven to be an illusion, a sort of mathematical fiction, and the causality as a well-established universal principle would be absolutely valid for subluminal, luminal and superluminal signals under any natural and/or artificial circumstances. It is also shown that any attempt to apply special relativity theory to superluminality of physical phenomena would be a complete waste of time since this theory has the light speed in vacuum as an upper limiting speed in its proper validity domain of applications.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Superluminal Signal Velocity and Causality.Günter Nimtz - 2004 - Foundations of Physics 34 (12):1889-1903.
Superluminal Signals and the Resolution of the Causal Paradox.F. Selleri - 2006 - Foundations of Physics 36 (3):443-463.
Re-thinking local causality.Simon Friederich - 2015 - Synthese 192 (1):221-240.
Causality Implies Formal State Collapse.George Svetlichny - 2003 - Foundations of Physics 33 (4):641-655.
Was Newton right after all?Irving F. Laucks - 1959 - Philosophy of Science 26 (3):229-239.
Einstein's Discourse Networks.Jimena Carnales - 2014 - Zeitschrift für Medien- Und Kulturforschung 2014 (1):11-39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-26

Downloads
537 (#35,153)

6 months
93 (#51,541)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references