Is the evidence for hyperbolic discounting in humans just an experimental artefact?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):657-657 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We question the behavioral premise underlying Ainslie's claims about hyperbolic discounting theory. The alleged evidence for humans can be easily explained as an artefact of experimental procedures that do not control for the credibility of payment over different time horizons. In appropriately controlled and financially motivated settings, human behavior is consistent with conventional exponential preferences.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
66 (#246,302)

6 months
20 (#130,532)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Prospecting neuroeconomics.Andreas Ortmann - 2008 - Economics and Philosophy 24 (3):431-448.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references