You ought to derive "ought" from "is"

Ethics 82 (2):155-162 (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/291837

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

You cannot derive "ought" from "is".Warren J. Samuels - 1973 - Ethics 83 (2):159-162.
Problems with Searle’s Derivation?Edmund Wall - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (3):571-580.
How to derive morality from Hume's Maxim.Gerald Hull - manuscript
Barriers to Implication.Greg Restall - unknown
Grounding Probabilities from below.Ian Hacking - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:110 - 116.
Can we derive the principle of compositionality (if we deflate understanding)?Antonio Rauti - 2009 - Dialectica 63 (2):157-174.
Ethics and the generous ontology.Eric T. Olson - 2010 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (4):259-270.
Abstract argumentation.Robert A. Kowalski & Francesca Toni - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):275-296.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
58 (#278,062)

6 months
6 (#530,265)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references