Utilitarian and common-sense morality discussions in intercultural nursing practice

Nursing Ethics 17 (2):201-211 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two areas of ethical conflict in intercultural nursing — who needs single rooms more, and how far should nurses go to comply with ethnic minority patients’ wishes? — are discussed from a utilitarian and common-sense morality point of view. These theories may mirror nurses’ way of thinking better than principled ethics, and both philosophies play a significant role in shaping nurses’ decision making. Questions concerning room allocation, noisy behaviour, and demands that nurses are unprepared or unequipped for may be hard to cope with owing to physical restrictions and other patients’ needs. Unsolvable problems may cause stress and a bad conscience as no solution is ‘right’ for all the patients concerned. Nurses experience a moral state of disequilibrium, which occurs when they feel responsible for the outcomes of their actions in situations that have no clear-cut solution

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Right to Touch and Be Touched.Pirkko Routasalo & Arja Isola - 1996 - Nursing Ethics 3 (2):165-176.
The Lived Experience of Nursing Advocacy.Robert G. Hanks - 2008 - Nursing Ethics 15 (4):468-477.
Ethics in nursing practice: a guide to ethical decision making.Sara T. Fry - 2008 - Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by Megan-Jane Johnstone.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
24 (#662,112)

6 months
4 (#799,214)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references