Finite Contractions on Infinite Belief Sets

Studia Logica 100 (5):907-920 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contractions on belief sets that have no finite representation cannot be finite in the sense that only a finite number of sentences is removed. However, such contractions can be delimited so that the actual change takes place in a logically isolated, finite-based part of the belief set. A construction that answers to this principle is introduced, and is axiomatically characterized. It turns out to coincide with specified meet contraction

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Specified Meet Contraction.Sven Ove Hansson - 2008 - Erkenntnis 69 (1):31-54.
A survey of multiple contractions.André Fuhrmann & Sven Ove Hansson - 1994 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3 (1):39-75.
Multiple kernel contraction.Eduardo Fermé, Karina Saez & Pablo Sanz - 2003 - Studia Logica 73 (2):183 - 195.
Multiple Kernel Contraction.Eduardo Fermé, Karina Saez & Pablo Sanz - 2003 - Studia Logica 73 (2):183-195.
A note on partial meet package contraction.Jun Li - 1998 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (2):139-142.
Kernel contraction.Sven Ove Hansson - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (3):845-859.
Blockage Contraction.Sven Ove Hansson - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (2):415-442.
Bootstrap Contraction.Sven Ove Hansson - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (5):1013-1029.
System of Spheres-based Multiple Contractions.Eduardo Fermé & Maurício D. L. Reis - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (1):29-52.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-18

Downloads
20 (#791,515)

6 months
1 (#1,514,069)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sven Ove Hansson
Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

Citations of this work

Bootstrap Contraction.Sven Ove Hansson - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (5):1013-1029.

Add more citations