Contrasting Medical Technology with Deprivation and Social Vulnerability. Lessons for the Ethical Debate on Cloning and Organ Transplantation Through the Film Never Let Me Go

NanoEthics 10 (3):245-256 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the film Never Let Me Go, clones are forced to donate their organs anonymously. As a work of fiction, this film can be regarded as a negotiation of limited agency, since the clones are depicted as vulnerable individuals. Thereby, it evokes a confrontation with underprivileged positions in technocratic societies, encouraging the audience to take the perspective of the marginalised. The clones are situated in ‘privileged deprivation’; from the audience’s point of view, they are unable to evolve into autonomous agents—but from their own perspective within the dystopian system, they are still ‘privileged’. In this paper, we analyse the depiction of the clones’ personal development. Further, we examine references to bioethical aspects as well as technologies that affect the human body both on a micro and macro level—cloning and its impact on the human embryo and organ donation practised on the full-grown human body. We argue that this film as a reference for the discussion in popular culture focuses on individuals who do not profit from modern technical progress or do not have enough agency to refuse it. To make this point, we analyse the film’s fictional story, set in a form of alternate history, as a negotiation of a historical context which brings out the idea of neglected voices.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Send in the clones ... Don't bother, they 're here'.B. Rollin - 1997 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 10 (1):25-40.
An expedient and ethical alternative to xenotransplantation.Josie Fisher - 1999 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2 (1):31-39.
Persons and their copies.D. McCarthy - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):98-104.
Aristotle and headless clones.Timothy Mosteller - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (4):339-350.
Ethical issues of modern life - the view of Islam.Pushpa Anbu - 2011 - Philosophy and Culture 38 (2):55-74.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
13 (#1,040,625)

6 months
4 (#797,974)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ethics and the Acquisition of Organs.T. M. Wilkinson - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Autonomy.Joel Feinberg - 1989 - In John Philip Christman (ed.), The Inner citadel: essays on individual autonomy. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 27--53.

View all 14 references / Add more references