New Light on the Vienna Circle

The Monist 65 (1):25-37 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the judgment of many historians of contemporary philosophy as well as of analytic philosophers of different lines, there is no doubt about the truth of the statement that the philosophy of the Vienna Circle is dead. And since it is dead, some think that the only remaining task could be to find out the cause that led to the downfall of this proud philosophical movement.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Virtual Debate in Exile: Cassirer and the Vienna Circle after 1933.Thomas Mormann - 2012 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 16:149 - 167.
The Vienna Circle.Viktor Kraft - 1953 - New York,: Greenwood Press.
Going around the vienna circle: Wittgenstein and verification.Michael Hymers - 2005 - Philosophical Investigations 28 (3):205–234.
Anti-foundationalism and the vienna circle's revolution in philosophy.Thomas E. Uebel - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):415-440.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
78 (#213,494)

6 months
11 (#238,317)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Einstein and Duhem.Don Howard - 1990 - Synthese 83 (3):363-384.
Ernst Mach.Paul Pojman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The development of the Neurath principle: unearthing the Romantic link.Gábor Á Zemplén - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (4):585-609.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references