Binding Theory in LTAG

Abstract

This paper provides a unification-based implementation of Binding Theory (BT) for the English language in the framework of feature-based lexicalized tree-adjoining grammar (LTAG). The grammar presented here does not actually coindex any noun phrases, it merely outputs a set of constraints on co- and contraindexation that may later be processed by a separate anaphora resolution module. It improves on previous work by implementing the full BT rather than just Condition A. The main technical innovation consists in allowing lists to appear as values of semantic features.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Unifying by binding: Will binding really bind?Jörn Diedrichsen & Eliot Hazeltine - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):884-885.
(Dis)solving the binding problem.James W. Garson - 2001 - Philosophical Psychology 14 (4):381 – 392.
The grammar of the nominal sentence: a government-binding approach.Zvi Penner - 1988 - [Bern]: Universitaet Bern, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.
Lexicalized Non-Local MCTAG with Dominance Links is NP-Complete.Lucas Champollion - 2011 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20 (3):343-359.
Condition C and Epistemic Contexts : A Case Study of Epithets and Anti-logophoricity Pronouns in French.Pierre Pica - 1995 - In Young-Sun Kim, Byung-Choon Lee, Kyoung-Jae Lee, Kyun-Kwon Yang & Jong-Kuri Yoon (eds.), A Festchrift for Dong-Whee Yang. Hankuk Publishing.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
34 (#483,840)

6 months
8 (#414,134)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?