Some arguments against G. E. Moore's view of the function of "good" in ethics

Mind 57 (227):322-340 (1948)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/mind/lvii.227.322

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Moore, normativity, and intrinsic value.Stephen Darwall - 2003 - Ethics 113 (3):468-489.
Breathing life into a dead argument: G.e. Moore and the open question. [REVIEW]Andrew Altman - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 117 (3):395-408.
Internalism about a person’s good: don’t believe it.Alexander Sarch - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (2):161-184.
The meaning of 'good' and the possibility of value.Philip Clark - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):31 - 38.
Moore's moral philosophy.Thomas Hurka - 2021 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Scanlon versus Moore on goodness.Philip Stratton-Lake & Brad Hooker - 2006 - In Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (eds.), Metaethics After Moore. Oxford University Press. pp. 149.
Corporate moral agency: Review and implications. [REVIEW]Geoff Moore - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 21 (4):329 - 343.
Function, homology and character individuation.Paul E. Griffiths - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (1):1-25.
Science, Nature, and Moore's Syncretic Aesthetic.Glenn Parsons - 2009 - Ethics, Place and Environment 12 (3):351-356.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#314,050)

6 months
19 (#145,246)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references