Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of stimulus similarity and strength of response to the CS

Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (6):408 (1957)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0046212

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning: I. The conditioned eyelid response to light.David A. Grant & Dorothy E. Schneider - 1948 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (6):690.
"Appropriateness" of the stimulus-reinforcement contingency in instrumental differential conditioning of the eyelid response to the arithmetic concepts of "right" and "wrong".Robert A. Fleming, Louise E. Cerekwicki & David A. Grant - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2):295.
Differential human eyelid conditioning as a function of the probability of reinforcement and CS similarity.Gail B. Peterson & Frederick L. Newman - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 85 (2):318.
Anxiety and strength of the UCS as determiners of the amount of eyelid conditioning.K. W. Spence & Janet Taylor - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (3):183.
Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the frequency and intensity of auditory CSs.John W. Moore - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (3):250.
Differential rabbit eyelid conditioning as a function of age, interstimulus interval, and cue similarity.Peter W. Frey - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (2):326.
Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the CS-UCS interval.Thomas F. Hartman & David A. Grant - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (2):131.
Differential eyelid conditioning to verbal stimuli varying in formal similarity.Dennis L. Foth & Willard N. Runquist - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):9.
Stimulus generalization as a function of UCS intensity in eyelid conditioning.John J. Porter - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (3):311.
Backward conditioning of the eyelid response.J. M. Porter - 1938 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 23 (4):403.
Transfer of differential eyelid conditioning: Effects of semantic and formal features of verbal stimuli.Michael J. Zajano, David A. Grant & Marian Schwartz - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (6):1147.
UCS intensity and the associative (habit) strength of the eyelid CR.K. W. Spence, D. F. Haggard & L. E. Ross - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (5):404.
CS termination and the response strength acquired by elements of a stimulus complex.Delos D. Wickens, Henry A. Cross & Robert M. Morgan - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (5):363.
Intelligence and age in discrimination conditioning of the eyelid response.Paul Gendreau & Milton D. Suboski - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (2):379.
Primary stimulus generalization under different percentages of reinforcement in eyelid conditioning.William E. Vandament & Louis Price - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (2):162.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
20 (#773,462)

6 months
11 (#248,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references