- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Sense of Appropriateness: Application Discourses in Morality and Law
State University of New York Press (1993)
Abstract
In the third and fourth parts of the book, Günther shows--in debate with Hare, Dworkin, and others--how argumentation on the appropriate application of norms and principles in morality and law is possible.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review essay: Moral application discourses Klaus Günther, the sense of appropriateness: Application discourses in morality and law, trans. John Farrell (albany, ny: Suny press, 1993).Victor Peterson - 1996 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (1):115-124.
Equality and Singularity in Justification and Application Discourses.Matthias Fritsch - 2010 - European Journal of Political Theory 9 (3):328-346.
The Sense of the Appropriate. Application Discourses in Morality and Law. [REVIEW]Urs Kindhäuser - 1991 - Philosophy and History 24 (1-2):17-18.
`Ought implies can' and two kinds of morality.John Kekes - 1984 - Philosophical Quarterly 34 (137):459-467.
Sense of fairness: Not by itself a moral sense and not a foundation of a lot of morality.Nalini Ramlakhan & Andrew Brook - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):96 - 97.
Justifying group-specific common morality.Carson Strong - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):1-15.
Common Sense Morality versus Role Morality.Ján Kalajtzidis - 2012 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 2 (3-4):133-143.
Reading Nietzsche in the Wake Of the 2008-09 War on Gaza.C. Heike Schotten - 2012 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 19 (1):67-82.
Buddhism Beyond Morality: A Note on Two Senses of Transcendence.Jeffrey Stout - 1978 - Journal of Religious Ethics 6 (2):319 - 325.
Your theory of the evolution of morality depends upon your theory of morality.David Kirkby, Wolfram Hinzen & John Mikhail - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):94-95.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-02-06
Downloads
53 (#307,532)
6 months
4 (#851,472)
2014-02-06
Downloads
53 (#307,532)
6 months
4 (#851,472)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Empirical ethics, context-sensitivity, and contextualism.Albert Musschenga - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):467 – 490.
How (far) can rationality be naturalized?Gerd Gigerenzer & Thomas Sturm - 2012 - Synthese 187 (1):243-268.
Particularity and perspective taking: On feminism and Habermas's discourse theory of morality.Charles Wright - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (4):47-74.
Critical Remarks on Robert Alexy's "Special-Case Thesis".Klaus Günther - 1993 - Ratio Juris 6 (2):143-156.
Moral Cognitivism and Legal Positivism in Habermas's and Kan't Philosophy of Law.Delamar José Volpato Dutra & Nythamar de Oliveira - 2017 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 16 (3):533-546.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-747975fc64-sshfw uwo