The Future of an Origin: Being and God in the Philosophy of Martin Heidegger

Dissertation, Graduate Theological Union (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Heidegger's thinking on God is examined in terms of four stages: the period before Being and Time; the meaning of Being ; the history of the truth of Being ; the clearing of Being . ;In the Habilitationsschrift the Scholastic notions of transcendental being and intentionality provide Heidegger with a framework to pursue the question of Being. The lack of a developed subjectivity of the subject in Scholasticism motivates Heidegger to develop the notion of Dasein as free transcendence in the Being and Time period. Heidegger combines the Scholastic notion of being as transcendence with the modern notion of transcendence as "my activity" . The question of divine transcendence becomes subordinated to human transcendence. ;In the "turn" Heidegger finds transcendence to be subjectivity, in which Being is metaphysically grounded in a being, so that it becomes forgotten. The "death" of the God of philosophy and the problem of "onto-theo-logy" surface: God is absent through subjectivity because the traditional philosophical concept of God is not "divine enough." In the Pre-Socratics, poets and mystics the later Heidegger seeks an experience of Being through non-metaphysical language, in which God may again speak. In the thing as "fourfold" he seeks an experience of Being and world free from subjectivity, in which God may again be present. ;In distinguishing Being as first from modern transcendence as subjectivity, Heidegger's thinking moves closer to his roots in the Scholastic notion of being as transcendental. Heidegger's earlier characterizing of Dasein as free transcendence can be understood onto-theo-logically. Disengaging Being from the grounding activity of being allows the question of God to be posed anew. ;Of the three ways theology speaks of God, the ways of negation and eminence emerge as compatible with Heidegger's thinking on God. The way of causality remains inadequate, not only for Heidegger but for Aquinas and Eckhart as well. For Aquinas God as "cause" is analogical, extrinsic to the nature of Godhead. Eckhart goes behind grounding as the duality of Creator-creature, cause-effect, to the sameness of Being as ground

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Does Heidegger Mean by the Transcendence of Dasein?Dermot Moran - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (4):491-514.
Transmetaphysical thinking in Heidegger and zen buddhism.John Steffney - 1977 - Philosophy East and West 27 (3):323-335.
Heidegger's transcendentalism.Daniel Dahlstrom - 2005 - Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):29-54.
Heidegger: The Problem of Metaphysics as the Domain of Finitude.Raymond F. Lussier - 1986 - Dissertation, St. John's University (New York)
Disentangling Heidegger’s transcendental questions.Chad Engelland - 2011 - Continental Philosophy Review 45 (1):77-100.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
1 (#1,908,206)

6 months
1 (#1,501,182)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references