Lotman on mimesis

Sign Systems Studies 31 (1):217-237 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article considers some basic notions of semiotics of mimesis by Juri Lotman, such as model, similarity, and relations between an object and its representation. The way Lotman defines and interprets these notions is compared with definitions given by adherents of the “semiotics of the transcendence” (German and Russian romanticism and Neoplatonism, Russian symbolism, theory of mystical symbol). A certain typological proximity ofsome important theoretical statements ensures the necessity to revise the traditional image of Tartu semiotics as a purely positivistic school of thought.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Vico and Lotman.Tuuli Raudla - 2008 - Sign Systems Studies 36 (1):137-164.
О семиосфере. Резюме.Juri Lotman - 2005 - Sign Systems Studies 33 (1):227-228.
Sümboliloome. Kokkuvõte.Cornelius Steckner - 2004 - Sign Systems Studies 32 (1-2):227-227.
L’épreuve de l’autre. — Testing the other.Eric Landowski - 2006 - Sign Systems Studies 34 (2):317-336.
Kahekümnenda sajandi semiootika. Kokkuvõte.Vyacheslav V. Ivanov - 2008 - Sign Systems Studies 36 (1):244-244.
Action in signs.Andres Luure - 2009 - Sign Systems Studies 37 (1/2):270-280.
From biorhetorics to zoorhetorics.Stephen Pain - 2009 - Sign Systems Studies 37 (3/4):498-508.
Семиотика опосредования. Резюме.Peeter Torop - 2012 - Sign Systems Studies 40 (3/4):556-556.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
13 (#1,060,918)

6 months
2 (#1,250,447)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references