Trägheit und Raum: Kant und Euler

Kantian Journal 41 (2):7-41 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kant’s natural philosophy in the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science is heavily influenced by Newton’s Principia. However, a closer look makes it clear that Kant’s project has also been influenced by other thinkers. One of these thinkers is Leonard Euler. His work was of great influence for Kant, not only with regards to his view on space and inertia but on the relation between metaphysics and natural science in general. Even though Euler’s Physics built on Newton’s work, he differs from him in fundamental regards, leading to crucial developments inside classical mechanics. Here I will discuss the influence of Euler on the work of Kant and focus on Euler’s view on the two entangled problems of inertia and space. It will become clear that both Euler and Kant went through a development concerning these fundamental notions. After shortly highlighting the differences between Kant and Newton, I shall go through the development of important parts of Euler’s natural philosophy concerning the above mentioned themes. I intend to demonstrate that he, through his refutation of Wolffianism, became an advocate for the necessity of absolute space but also denied the existence of an internal force of inertia. After that I will show how Kant’s reading of Euler lead to crucial changes of his natural philosophy in particular and his philosophical enterprise in general. I therefore analyze Kant’s revision of his theory of space and inertia in his precritical writings. Building upon that, I will show the influence of these thoughts on his Metaphysical Foundations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Euler y Kant.Carlos Minguez - 1985 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 1 (2):411-438.
Euler, Newton, and Foundations for Mechanics.Marius Stan - 2013 - In Chris Smeenk & Eric Schliesser (eds.), Newton's Principia. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-22.
The Development of Kant's Conception of Scientific Explanation.Edward MacKinnon - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:18 - 30.
Kant: Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science.Immanuel Kant - 2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Michael Friedman.
Leonhard Euler's ‘anti-Newtonian’ theory of light.R. W. Home - 1988 - Annals of Science 45 (5):521-533.
Kant’s Proof of the Law of Inertia.Kenneth Westphal - 1995 - In H. Robinson (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Kant Congress. Marquette University Press. pp. 413-424.
Rationalist Foundations and the Science of Force.Marius Stan - forthcoming - In Brandon Look & Frederick Beiser (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of German Eighteenth-Century Philosophy. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-17

Downloads
16 (#913,262)

6 months
4 (#799,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kant and the exact sciences.Michael Friedman - 1992 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Книги об образовании: люди и идеи.П.А Сафронов - 2012 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 34 (4):245-247.
The Laws of Motion from Newton to Kant.Eric Watkins - 1997 - Perspectives on Science 5 (3):311-348.
The early Kant’s Newtonianism.Eric Watkins - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):429-437.

View all 17 references / Add more references